Plagiarism Policy

Research Integrity  ·  COPE-Compliant  ·  DOAJ & Web of Science Standards

Compliant withCOPEDOAJWeb of ScienceOASPA
Knowledgeable Research upholds the highest standards of academic integrity and takes a firm stance against plagiarism in all its forms. Plagiarism, whether in text, images, or data, is deemed unethical and unacceptable — a serious violation of scholarly standards, morally corrosive, and, in many jurisdictions, illegal.
1

Definition and Scope

Plagiarism is defined as the use of another person's ideas, text, data, images, or creative work without appropriate acknowledgement, regardless of whether the source is published, unpublished, or digital. This policy applies to all forms of plagiarism, including:

  • Verbatim copying — reproducing text word-for-word without quotation marks and citation.
  • Paraphrasing without attribution — rewording another's ideas without crediting the source.
  • Self-plagiarism — reusing one's own previously published content without disclosure.
  • Data and image appropriation — using figures, tables, or datasets without permission or citation.
  • Mosaic plagiarism — assembling text fragments from multiple sources to obscure copying.
  • Improper citation — citing sources in a misleading or inaccurate manner.
2

Pre-Submission Responsibilities

Before submitting any manuscript, authors are required to conduct a plagiarism check using a reliable detection tool. The following software is recommended for this purpose:

  • iThenticate / Turnitin — industry-standard tools used by leading international journals.
  • Urkund (Ouriginal) — widely used for cross-checking against academic sources.
  • Grammarly / Plagiarism Detector — acceptable for pre-submission self-checks.

Submissions that contain plagiarised content — including improperly cited work — will be rejected or returned to the authors for revision without undergoing the peer review process.

3

Plagiarism Screening Process

All submitted articles are screened for plagiarism prior to being assigned to the Editorial Board. Screening is conducted using iThenticate or Turnitin (via Crossref Similarity Check). The Editorial Board applies contextual judgement — similarity arising from standard terminology, methodology descriptions, or properly cited quotations is distinguished from problematic matches.

4

Plagiarism Thresholds and Action

The following thresholds govern editorial decisions. Note that the similarity index is an indicator, not the sole criterion — citation accuracy and context are assessed in every case.

Similarity Index Classification Editorial Action
Below 10% Acceptable Proceed to Peer Review
Subject to Editor-in-Chief review; minor citation corrections may be required.
10% – 20% Moderate — revision required Return for Revision
Authors must revise and resubmit with a corrected similarity report. Revised manuscript re-screened before peer review.
Above 20% Unacceptable Manuscript Rejected
Authors are notified with the similarity report. Severe cases may be escalated per COPE guidelines.
⚠ Important NoteA low similarity index does not guarantee the absence of plagiarism. Improperly cited work — regardless of the similarity score — constitutes plagiarism and will be treated accordingly.
5

Originality Requirement

Authors are expected to submit original work. If including others' work is necessary, proper citations and references must be provided. All authors should ensure that they have received written consent from other authors or institutions before incorporating their ideas or findings into the manuscript.

  • All direct quotations must be enclosed in quotation marks and cited accurately.
  • Any overlap with the authors' own prior publications must be disclosed and properly referenced.
  • Use of unpublished data or correspondence from others requires their explicit written permission, noted in the Acknowledgements.
6

Plagiarism Monitoring and Reporting

The journal reserves the right to verify plagiarism reports using various detection tools. If plagiarism is detected, authors will be notified immediately and may be asked to provide a revised manuscript or a justification for the similarities. Any articles with identified plagiarism will not proceed to peer review without addressing the issues.

COPE-Compliant Investigation ProcedureWhere plagiarism is alleged in a submitted or published article, the journal follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) flowcharts. The Editor-in-Chief initiates a confidential review, the corresponding author is contacted for a response, and action — ranging from revision to retraction and institutional reporting — is taken proportionate to the severity of the finding.

⚠ Consequences of Confirmed Plagiarism

  • Immediate rejection or retraction of the manuscript or article.
  • Formal notification sent to the corresponding author and all co-authors.
  • Reporting to the author's institution or funding body, as appropriate.
  • Prohibition from submitting to the journal for a defined period.
  • Reporting to relevant academic authorities in cases of serious misconduct.
  • A public retraction notice indexed in Crossref and all relevant databases.
Knowledgeable Research is committed to maintaining the integrity of the academic community. Any form of plagiarism is considered a violation of research ethics and will result in severe consequences, including rejection of the article and potential reporting of the misconduct to relevant academic authorities. Authors must be diligent in ensuring their work is original and properly cited to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in an ethical and credible manner.
Policy last reviewed:March 2026 ·  Next review:March 2027 ·  This version supersedes all prior versions.