Sign Language Detection using Deep Learning

Authors

  • Himesh Mishra, Rahul Rathour, Mohd Abuzar Suhail, Daya Shankar Srivastava & Mr. Arjun Singh GREATER NOIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, GREATER NOIDA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57067/29pxvn88

Keywords:

Sign Language, Deep learning, Communication, LSTM, GRU

Abstract

According to the 2011 Census, In India, out of the total population of 121 crores, approximately 2.68 Crore humans are 'Disabled' (2.21 % of the whole population)). Sign Language serves as a means for these people with special needs to communicate with others, but it is not a simple task. This barrier to communication has been addressed by researchers for years. The goal of this study is to demonstrate the Mobile Nets model's experimental performance on the TensorFlow platform when training the Sign language. Language Recognition Model, which can drastically reduce the amount of time it takes to learn a new language. Classification of Sign Language motions in terms of time and space Developing a portable solution for a real-time application. The Mobile net V2 Model was trained for this purpose and an Accuracy of 70% was obtained. The four different sequential combinations of LSTM and GRU (as there are two layers of LSTM and two layers of GRU) were used with our own dataset, IISL2020. The proposed model, consisting of a single layer of LSTM followed by GRU, achieves around 97% accuracy over 11 different signs. This method may help persons who are unaware of sign language to communicate with persons whose speech or hearing is impaired.

References

Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation. Available online: https://pib.gov.in/ Press Release Page. aspx? P RID=1593253 (accessed on 5 January 2022)

Manware, A.; Raj, R.; Kumar, A.; Pawar, T. Smart Gloves as a Communication Tool for the Speech Impaired and Hearing Impaired. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res. 2017, 4, 78-82

Wadhawan, A.; Kumar, P. Sign language recognition systems: A decade systematic literature review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2021, 28, 785-813. [CrossRef]

Papastratis, 1.; Chatzikonstantinou, C.; Konstantinidis, D.; Dimitropoulos, K.; Daras, P. Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Sign Language. Sensors 2021, 21, 5843. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Nandy, A.; Prasad, J.; Mondal, S.; Chakraborty, P.; Nandi, G. Recognition of Isolated Indian Sign Language Gesture in Real Time. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2010, 70, 102-107

Mekala, Gao, Y; Fan, Davari, A. Real-time sign language recognition based on neural network architecture. In Proceedings of the IEEE 43rd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, Aubum, AL, USA, 14-16 March 2011.

Chen, J.K. Sign Language Recognition with Unsupervised Feature Learning; CS229 Project Final Report; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2011.

Sharma, M.; Pal, R.; Sahoo, A. Indian sign language recognition using neural networks and KNN classifiers. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2014.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Sign Language Detection using Deep Learning. (2024). Knowledgeable Research: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(11), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.57067/29pxvn88

Similar Articles

1-10 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.